Truth or consequences

Last week, I watched the first few episodes of House of Cards, a new Netflix original series centered on a corrupt congressman played by Kevin Spacey and his wheelings and dealings in a fictionalized version of Washington, D.C. Having spent three years living in D.C. and working in politics, I found myself preoccupied by the show’s minor errors and implausibilities, such as Spacey’s character seeming to have such a small congressional staff, or the appearance of NYC-style yellow cabs in a city that has none. I felt that inconsistencies like these detracted from the narrative and relevance of the show, especially when they seemed so small and easily fixed.

I kept reflecting on this as I worked my way through Robinson Crusoe over the weekend, noticing that some felt the same way about Daniel Defoe’s novel when it was published in the early 18th century. Particularly in the early sections of the novel wherein Defoe sets the historical and geographical stage for his protagonist’s adventure, the text is pocked by errors and inconsistencies, several of which are pointed out in our edition’s Explanatory Notes. Crusoe and his father speak of his elder brother’s death years before the battle in which he is said to have been killed takes place; sailing down the coast of Africa, he claims to have been able to see islands that are in reality almost 400 miles away; he errs in describing the history of Spanish Asientos in the slave trade, claims to see penguins in a region that no species of penguin inhabit, and fashions himself an umbrella decades before they were introduced to the Western world.

Such errors, our text notes, were the subject of criticism from a contemporary “embittered rival,” Charles Gildon, but also more serious academic criticism over the years, including a 1912 essay by William T. Hastings, which includes an exhaustive list of chronological errors that arise from Defoe’s commitment to precise, obsessive detail:

It is generally recognized that Robinson Crusoe is a triumphant piece of verisimilitude, that it is unsurpassed among fictitious narratives for its air of guileless veracity. It is not so generally recognized that in securing this realism and this appearance of truth Defoe was led not infrequently to violate actual “truth” or consistency.

Only with the distance of a few centuries’ time am I able to see how trivial and meaningless such nitpicking really is. What do minor errors and inconsistencies have to do with Robinson Crusoe’s larger narrative, its thematic content, its political and historical relevance? Is its spiritual and moral message invalidated by an anachronism or two? Does the irony embedded in Crusoe’s untroubled acceptance of the institution of slavery, which arguably forms the crux of the novel, lose its potency? Of course not. Great fiction, like all great art, becomes timeless, rising above petty implausibilities and discrepancies of fact — penguins and yellow cabs alike.


One thought on “Truth or consequences

  1. I think you make a relevant point here. Although I’m not versed enough in history or geography to notice the inconsistencies you mentioned above, on detail frustrated me a bit. The dog.

    It seems Defoe added this dog into the novel for convenience, making it vanish and reappear strategically when Crusoe is going on expeditions to explore. I reread certain passages numerous times, and could not find mention of the dog when Crusoe first gets to the island, and sometimes it goes unmentioned for such long periods of time I’m confused when he finally brings it up again.

    Anyway, this minor detail in no way effects the overall message of the novel, and is probably something most readers over look entirely, but for some reason its been driving me crazy the entire time I’ve been reading!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s